Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
I had postponed this one accidentally:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Jerry Gamblin wrote:
> "Most people believed that? How do you know? You claim to be an expert
> on so many things, yet you are wrong again and again. It seems that you
> are incorrect in this instance. Here is a press release from the
> Journal of the American Medical Association:
>
> http://taxa.epi.umn.edu/rmnews/1999/msg00006.html"
>
> You want to do some fact checking Mike?
OK. Sure, go ahead...
> A) That survey was from 1991, 8 years before the incident we are talking
> about.
OK. And your point is? You have no data, but you seem to be arguing that
the definition of sex changed during the 8 years between 1991 and 1999.
We have data on 1991 and it contradicts your guess work.
> B) That survey only took into consideration a very small population
> group. Probably the most liberal of all population groups when it comes
> to sex and margin of yes to no votes was 6 to 4.
Are you saying that more conservative people would define sex more
broadly? Do you have some data on that?
> Also this quote is a big one:
>
> The authors write: "The virtually universal endorsement of
> penile-vaginal intercourse as having 'had sex' in contrast with the
> diverse opinions for other behaviors highlights the primacy of
> penile-vaginal intercourse in American definitions of having 'had sex.'"
And what does it tell us?
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion