MLUG: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] State's rights vs Federal responsibility
RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] State's rights vs Federal responsibility
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Most people believed that?  How do you know?  You claim to be an expert
on so many things, yet you are wrong again and again.  It seems that you
are incorrect in this instance.  Here is a press release from the
Journal of the American Medical Association:

http://taxa.epi.umn.edu/rmnews/1999/msg00006.html";

You want to do some fact checking Mike?

A) That survey was from 1991, 8 years before the incident we are talking
about.

B) That survey only took into consideration a very small population
group. Probably the most liberal of all population groups when it comes
to sex and margin of yes to no votes was 6 to 4. 

Also this quote is a big one:

The authors write: "The virtually universal endorsement of
penile-vaginal
intercourse as having 'had sex' in contrast with the diverse opinions
for
other behaviors highlights the primacy of penile-vaginal intercourse in
American definitions of having 'had sex.'"


Jerry Gamblin
EMAIL:PROTECTED
 

-----Original Message-----
From: EMAIL:PROTECTED
[mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Miller
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 3:43 PM
To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion
Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] State's rights vs Federal
responsibility

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Jerry Gamblin wrote:

> SO loop holes are fine with you?

Yes, in this case, which was not worth prosecuting.


> So Clinton said that a blowjob wasn't sex,

No he didn't.  The judge said that.


> so when he testified under oath that it was ok. Most people believed
it 
> was sex.

Most people believed that?  How do you know?  You claim to be an expert
on 
so many things, yet you are wrong again and again.  It seems that you
are 
incorrect in this instance.  Here is a press release from the Journal of

the American Medical Association:

http://taxa.epi.umn.edu/rmnews/1999/msg00006.html


> Oh, and when he tried to "kill" Osama all he did was bomb an Aspirin 
> factory in Sudan? What was his plan to stop Osama from getting an 
> aspirin to cure his headache?

Your insipid comments are beginning to remind me of Matt Ross.  Do you 
read my messages?  Do you look at the articles I recommend?  Well, if
you 
did, you'd know that Clinton bombed sites in Afghanistan.  It would have

been wise for Bush to have followed up with more bombing in Afghanistan,

but Bush decided to wait until we were attacked and several thousand 
people were killed.

Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
NOTE: 

This e-mail transmission may contain confidential information.  
If you are not the intended recipient, employee or agent responsible 
for delivering this information to the intended recipient, 
unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the 
contents of this transmission is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender 
and delete it from your computer. Thank you for your compliance.

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion