Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what majority wants Bush?

[Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Rick Buford wrote:

> Mike Miller wrote:
>
>> If the court had any sense, they would have written a reasonable 
>> definition of "sex" or "sexual relations."  The court screwed up, left an 
>> opening, and Clinton took it.  He's a lawyer, just like most Presidents 
>> and most Senators, Congressmen and Governors, so you should expect him to 
>> follow the letter of the law in this kind of situation.
>
> and you apparently approve of the use of this legal loophole for your 
> Democrat president...

My point is simple:  I don't care.  It doesn't matter.  They shouldn't 
have been asking him about it.  But guess what, they were paid for their 
time, paid very well using our tax dollars.  So what point was there in 
stopping?


> Personally, I expect the leader of the most powerful nation on the 
> planet (as well as all other public figures) to behave "better", be they 
> Democrat, Republican, or Martian. What would your wife think of the 
> "legal definition of sex" if it came to light you got a hummer in your 
> office?

Why cares about my wife? - ask Clinton's wife Hillary.  She has a book 
out.  You can read that.

Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion