Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what majority wants Bush?

[Rick Buford <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Mike Miller wrote:

> Read what I wrote (recapped above) - it's about the *court's* definition 
> of sex, not about the dictionary definition of sex.  Read this...
> 
> http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/08/17/time/clinton.html
> 
> ...or any one of the other million articles about the *facts* of the case.
> 
> If the court had any sense, they would have written a reasonable 
> definition of "sex" or "sexual relations."  The court screwed up, left 
> an opening, and Clinton took it.  He's a lawyer, just like most 
> Presidents and most Senators, Congressmen and Governors, so you should 
> expect him to follow the letter of the law in this kind of situation.
> 
and you apparently approve of the use of this legal loophole for your 
Democrat president...

Personally, I expect the leader of the most powerful nation on the 
planet (as well as all other public figures) to behave "better", be they 
Democrat, Republican, or Martian. What would your wife think of the 
"legal definition of sex" if it came to light you got a hummer in your 
office?

> 
> This is silly.  Clinton used a legal loophole to claim that he had not 
> had sex with a willing partner.  That is "corrupt?"  I think you should 
> look at the definition of that term.
> 
See above.

> Don't accuse the Democrats of corruption unless you can demonstrate 
> corruption.  In 8 years of investigation, the Republicans came up with 
> *nothing* on Bill Clinton.  Nothing.  Now check out the Nixon and Reagan 
> administrations - extreme corruption.

I truly hope that your unfailing support for your party is rewarded some 
day. Sadly, some of us still have to live in the real world, where 
powerful people pursue their own agendas. You seem to have the idea that 
I'm some conservative that's not listening to your liberal-speak, while 
missing the point that I don't like --either-- party, or politicians in 
general.

However, all the time I've spent responding to posts in this thread will 
be well spent if just one person, be he/she liberal or conservative, 
spends more time learning for themselves, instead of swallowing some 
party line, just because not doing so interferes with their belief system.

-- 
Begin clever signature:
libido ergo sum
----------End Transmission
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion