MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what majority wants Bush?
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what majority wants Bush?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

> 
> Yes, but Chad was once a baby.
> 
as were most of us, so I don't see the relevance...
> 
<snip...>
> Yes, but recently a judge has even declared unconstitutional a law that 
> stops abortions of viable fetus's.  (I must admit that I don't see where 
> he got that from - my recollection was that Roe versus Wade only 
> concerns the first trimester.)
that is also my recollection...but, again, what is the relevance?

-- 
Begin clever signature:
libido ergo sum
----------End Transmission
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion