Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Spurling, Shannon wrote:
> there is no reason for Bush to even acknowledge those ads, and Kerry
> would have been in a much better position if he had done the same thing
> or sat down and addressed them directly once in a press conference.
Why do you believe that? Don't you know that the ads were widely seen,
widely believed, and had a noticable effect on Kerry's popularity? So
it's best for him to just let it go? Why? That makes no sense to me.
The statements were utter lies made up by people who were not on Kerry's
boat and were not witnesses to Kerry's actions. But Kerry should just
ignore all of that. Please!
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact