MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what majority wants Bush?
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what majority wants Bush?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Rick Buford wrote:
> And you are entitled to your opinion. However, I'm assuming that with 
> Chad as a first name, you are male, so why should you get a vote in the 
> matter at all? There is absolutely no possibility that you will ever 
> experience the morning sickness, bloating, funky boobs, baby-related 
> stretch marks, etc ad nauseum. On top of that, if you so chose, you have 
> the ability to simply walk away and have no more responsibility than 
> what the state levies against your wages (I'm not saying you would, 
> merely that you could). The potential mother doesn't have that recourse.
> 

Yes, but Chad was once a baby.


> I do believe that aborting a viable fetus (24 weeks-ish)  is wrong, but 
> until that fetus can "live" on it's own, then it should be the mother's 
> choice.
> 


Yes, but recently a judge has even declared unconstitutional a law that 
stops abortions of viable fetus's.  (I must admit that I don't see where 
he got that from - my recollection was that Roe versus Wade only 
concerns the first trimester.)
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion