MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what majority wants Bush?
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what majority wants Bush?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Rick Buford wrote:
> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> 
>>
>> By declaring abortion as a constitutionally protected activity, one is 
>> effectively ostrocising all pro-lifers from involvement in any kind of 
>> genuine legal debate.  Anyone who truly believes in choice should 
>> still be opposed to Roe versus Wade, even if they agree with allowing 
>> abortions.  It should not be a constitutional issue unless an 
>> appropriate constitutional ammendment can be passed.
>>
> This is such a sideways argument from the pro-life platform that I have 
> a hard time you actually believe it.

I never heard the argument you critisize from any other source.  It is 
my argument, so yes, I do believe it.

> 
> Really, is what you're saying, that our laws and consititution should 
> just be done away with, and society should just tend to itself because 
> we're all grown-ups?
> 

No - I wasn't saying that at all.

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion