Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Rick Buford wrote:
> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> By declaring abortion as a constitutionally protected activity, one is
>> effectively ostrocising all pro-lifers from involvement in any kind of
>> genuine legal debate. Anyone who truly believes in choice should
>> still be opposed to Roe versus Wade, even if they agree with allowing
>> abortions. It should not be a constitutional issue unless an
>> appropriate constitutional ammendment can be passed.
>>
> This is such a sideways argument from the pro-life platform that I have
> a hard time you actually believe it.
I never heard the argument you critisize from any other source. It is
my argument, so yes, I do believe it.
>
> Really, is what you're saying, that our laws and consititution should
> just be done away with, and society should just tend to itself because
> we're all grown-ups?
>
No - I wasn't saying that at all.
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion