Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
> By declaring abortion as a constitutionally protected activity, one is
> effectively ostrocising all pro-lifers from involvement in any kind of
> genuine legal debate. Anyone who truly believes in choice should still
> be opposed to Roe versus Wade, even if they agree with allowing
> abortions. It should not be a constitutional issue unless an
> appropriate constitutional ammendment can be passed.
>
This is such a sideways argument from the pro-life platform that I have
a hard time you actually believe it.
Pro-choice: It's the woman's choice!
Pro-life: It's not a choice because you won and we lost and therefore
don't have a choice!
Really, is what you're saying, that our laws and consititution should
just be done away with, and society should just tend to itself because
we're all grown-ups?
--
Begin clever signature:
libido ergo sum
----------End Transmission
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact