Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] what majority wants Bush?

[Dave Lloyd <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Mike Miller wrote:

> No.  The constitution does not mention abortion.  The law depends on the 
> Supreme Court interpretation of the Constitution as protecting abortion 
> rights.  If Bush, and people like him, can replace enough liberal judges 
> with conservative judges, a state can make an anti-abortion law, challenge 
> Roe v. Wade and win!  Once Roe v. Wade is overturned but the US Supreme 
> Court, states can impose anti-abortion legislation on their citizens.

True.  I'm busy today, so what I really meant (and paraphrased figuring
that people would understand, but I guess I was wrong about that) is
that the supreme court has decided that a woman's right to an abortion
is constitutionally protected, but that could change if the judges
change.   

--dlloyd
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion