Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | ContactMy main beef with Kerry, I watched Good Morning America (Or something similar, don't remember the morning show for sure, they are all the same format) the other morning, Kerry's kids and Edwards' kids were on the show. One of Kerry's daughters were asked what she thought of the criticism that Kerry got about flip-flopping on the issues. Her answer told me more ab out John Kerry than I had even known on the issue. She said that her father analyzes the issues, he researches it from all angles and once he fully understands the problem, only then does he act. This really made me think. If this is how he makes his decisions, then how on earth can he possibly change his mind so often? It is possible for someone to change their minds, but on so many issues? I want someone that knows what they are doing, what they think is right, I might not like it, but for me it means a lot when someone does what they think is right and deals with the ramifications. So someone with real credibility to me would stand up and say, "Yes, I did make that decision, and I stand behind that decision." Instead with Kerry it seems like it is more like "Yeah I made that decision, but I know you didn't like it, so I will change my mind and say it was wrong." Despite anything you might want to say about Bush, he is not flip-flopping on his decisions. On the contrary he is riding them all the way to the bottom of the ocean. There is no political double talk and redefining of words with Bush, well at least when he uses the words correctly. This double talk and redefining of words seems to be the standard operating procedure for democrats. Kerry is very critical of Bush, saying he would do this and that. For instance, he says he wants to lesson the tax load on the working middle class, he wants to deliver universal health care to all, he wants eliminate the moving of jobs overseas, and protect the environment. He says he is the best choice for the security of the United States as well, and he says that 100 or some odd number of other countries leaders want him to be President. Now how does he plan to do this if elected? Does anyone know? What is his plan? What happens when he is elected and he has to make the tough decisions? Does he make these decisions based on whatever breeze is blowing through the land? What happens when he goes to Nike, or some other large company sending jobs overseas and asks them to stop and they say no? How does he force them to stop? Impose some kind of tax on them? How can someone lower the tax burden on the working middle class, the largest tax base in the country and still offer universal health care, the largest private industry in the US? Why is he coming out on a Hispanic radio station saying how he thinks that an American Drivers license is something that should be reserved for legal American citizens and then have his PR person come out not 2 hours later and say that he believes it is really a state issue? These are all questions that have to be answered by Kerry and he has not answered them sufficiently for me. So there it is. If you have read my other responses then you should know what I feel about leadership. I am concerned about Kerry's abilities to do this. If you can find information on specifics of Kerry's plan, then I would be interested in seeing them, but I have had no luck and I doubt they even exist. _____ From: EMAIL:PROTECTED [mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodsmall, Ryan (IATS) Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 11:05 AM To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Kerry: No Time for Terror Briefing http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040719 <http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040719&s=aaj071904> &s=aaj071904 This might be the July Surprise that the administration is using to tempt Kerry. It makes me sick to see something like that played out politically, but so many former presidents, both Democratic and Republican, have done it before. It's all politics to them, and it makes me sick... What's that old saying about anyone who aspires to be the president has no business doing so? Vernon, what's your main beef with Kerry? I know I probably can't win you over to the dark (blue) side, but I'd like to know why you don't like him just for reference. And you have to vote! It's your civil duty! :) ryan woodsmall EMAIL:PROTECTED _____ From: EMAIL:PROTECTED on behalf of F Vernon Green Sent: Sat 7/10/2004 11:38 AM To: 'MLUG Off-Topic Discussion' Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Kerry: No Time for Terror Briefing Mike, I have to agree with you on this one. That is a first eh? I also think it was a mistake for Bush to even make the offer. If it wasn't for Kerry being the democratic candidate, Bush would never have offered it. This shows weakness on the side of Bush and is another mistake in a long string of mistakes for Bush. The only thing that remotely could be happening here is some kind of bluff on Bush's part. Perhaps Bush has some intelligence that is going to prove very difficult for Kerry if he wins based on Kerry's current anti-war stance. Bush might think that if Kerry knew this information he would be forced to change his stand on the subject. This could then be used to cement Kerry as a flip-flopper on the issues. If Kerry did not change his stand then he would have to change it when he became President. Either way it is a gamble by Bush and is a huge mistake. I am honest here when I say I am sick of Bush right now, and since I cannot support Kerry, I think I am going to have to rely on the rest of America to make this decision for me.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
_______________________________________________ discussion mailing list EMAIL:PROTECTED http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion