Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, F Vernon Green wrote:
> I think for many people Bush was a vote against the Ivy League crowd
> that have been in power for so long.
That's interesting. Bush went to Yale and was a member of Skull and
Bones. Your blood can't get any bluer than that!! Are people falling for
his fake Texas accent? (He didn't grow up in Texas.)
> There are always those people out there, dare I say a lot like Mike here,
> that no matter what, come hell or high water they are going to vote
> democratic.
I voted for a Republican once - Scott Klug in Madison, WI. His opponent
seemed extremely naive. Scott did fairly well. I would vote for more
Republicans but I have to have good reasons. If I don't know anything
about the candidates, I usually don't vote.
> To me Kerry is like Clinton, he is taking a page from the Clinton
> playbook, the difference is he does not have the looks and personality
> to pull it off.
Well, Clinton was very good for our country, so I'd be happy to have a
Clintonesque leader even if he isn't as good looking as Clinton.
> With Bush you might not like his stand on things, but it is pretty
> certain that he is not going to flip flop on it because popular opinion
> says that he should. In this case he is leading and not following. A
> leader is not defined by always doing what the masses want, where is the
> leadership in that? A leader is defined by making the tough choices that
> on the surface might be unpopular, but at least he feels they are right.
> I think in Bush you have this for good or bad and people actually
> recognize it.
Of course, the problem is that Bush will 'lead' us into things we don't
want. I'll take a good follower over a bad leader any day! ;-)
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion