Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] The Day After Tomorrow

[Jennifer Dozar <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 08:42:49AM -0500, Heivilin, Jim wrote:
> > 
> To expect Sillywood to make a film with any science in it is the height
> of folly.  Again and again they prove that although they may give credit
> to some good names for Scientific Advisor they rarely listen to him.  I
> went to see "Van Helsing" with a friend (I mentioned it first on my list
> of what's showing and I couldn't get him to unfixate on it) and it was
> hilarious.  I'm not an English Major or anything but even I could tell
> how badly they mangled the literature.  So badly it was funny, just
> about the time you figure out "this must be the way you have to kill a
> vampire" they change it and start the ending "climatic" battle scenes. 

Van Helsing was fun :) I enjoyed it, and it had some weird parts in it.  As long as you relized the characters were litature references only, you won't get too upset. 

I still haven't decided about the Day After Tomorrow.  A friend has asked me if i'd like to go see it with her, but i told her i don't know yet. I was feeling kind of happy Harry Potter was finally out, but I heard it wasn't very good and wasn't anything like the book!  I guess i'll find out sometime in the near future.

> >
> Don't go here.  Star Trek was ruined by Burman much as Lucas has ruin
> Star Wars.  

Lucas has ruined star wars!!!  I couldn'nt stand Episode 2. One I enjoyed for entertainment reasons... but 2 was awful and the name of it was awful... and it was just awful. 


-- 
--
Jennifer Dozar
http://seul.org/~jennifer/osschools/
*******************************************
ALL YOUR BASEPAIR ARE BELONG TO US!

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion