Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Conservationism (was: The Day After Tomorrow)
- From: "Heivilin, Jim" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 08:52:27 -0500
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Thread-index: AcRIqGRUK5DxWbUkSV+zzUVuRZfJGQAAFbRw
- Thread-topic: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Conservationism (was: The Day AfterTomorrow)
> -----Original Message-----
> [mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Miller
> Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Conservationism (was: The
>
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Woodsmall, Ryan (IATS) wrote:
>
> > To say Bush's "compassionate conservativism" is about conservation
> > anymore is a joke. To say it's even conservative is joke.
>
> It is an interesting contradiction that "conservatives"
> generally do not want to conserve natural resources --
> they want to sell them to corporations at relatively low cost.
>
> It is also interesting that being "pro life" is associated
> with being pro death penalty.
>
Are these the other beliefs held by those who are known as or call
themselves conservatives or are these the perceptions from others?
Jim
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion