MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Is science a religion?
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Is science a religion?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Perhaps the dominant branching killed off the competition before they 
became obviously divergent. To say there are no "tweens" is to ignore 
the fact that there are hundreds of different "species" of other 
animals. Simply examining human beings willingness to wipe out anybody 
"different" over the last thousand years or so definately supports this 
theory...

Hell, we can't even be different colors without someone having issues, 
just imagine how the cavemen with the extra arms were treated...

 Well, let's just say, 'if your VCR is still blinking 12:00, you don't want Linux'. 



Spurling, Shannon wrote:

>Oh, yeah, and I think he was trying to say that, if the jump to man was
>so successful, where are the "tweens"? Why should we have apes and not
>any of the forms in between? All sapiens seam to have evolved into the
>Homo sapiens. Why don't you have branching from any of the others? There
>should be some surviving of the other forms in some manner or another. 
>
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion