RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Another Rant

["F Vernon Green" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

I got to thinking about this last night too. I honestly have no problem with
them being stripped naked either. That is a common thing when someone is
arrested, to go through a strip search. (I have been arrested but never
strip searched myself). The problem is that when you are stripped down in
that fashion, you cannot go around hamming it up for the camera, making the
people you are searching perform sex acts and things of the sort. Somewhere
a line must be drawn.

-----Original Message-----
From: EMAIL:PROTECTED
[mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan King
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 8:13 AM
To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion
Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Another Rant


On Mon, 3 May 2004, F Vernon Green wrote:

> I am not sure I would agree, the pictures I saw really have no
> equipment in them that would depict a time or place that it
> happened. I would like to know the source of the pictures though.

I think he was talking about another set of pictures that came out
at the same time.  These were outdoor shots, and some of them were
purported to show the rape and torture of female civilians.  But 
they were quickly discredited; I don't konw where they came from.

The film shown on 60 minutes turned up, I believe, in an 
investigation of the original mistreatment complaints.  I will 
never understand the compulsion some people have to film themselves 
and others in incredibly incriminating situations lke this, but 
there you go.

jking


_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion