Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Who is the Idiot....
- From: "McNutt, Justin M." <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 08:11:49 -0500
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Thread-index: AcQuYf4CQmdmXFjBQS6vqArpT0ZEtAAABxUwABotaXAAAFFGjQCQliNw
- Thread-topic: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Who is the Idiot....
Title: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Who is the Idiot....
Like I said, voice your
views on the war all you want. Saying "he deserved it" about a U.S.
soldier getting killed while fighting pro-Taliban (and pro-terrorist) forces
in Afghanistan is too much.
What's comical is, the person who wrote
this article is probably very liberal and wants equal rights for gays, women,
and minorities. Yet, these people that Tillman was fighting would
happily kill the author of this article for carrying those very
beliefs.
So, in short, this author must have a
real problem with the nation if he is saying people who die fighting the
Taliban and their supporters "deserve
it".
No, it's too much FOR YOU, and your
other assumptions about the author are just that: assumptions. They
are therefore not worth a whole lot to the discussion, especially since you only
made the comment to run down the guy, not make any actual
point.
Besides, you're missing the point. There are two
arguments here:
1) What the author wrote is/isn't true or correct
or whatever.
ANSWER: It's an impossible question. He
wrote his OPINION. Everybody else then went out and gave everybody who
would listen another opinion. Repeat ad nauseum. That's what the
First Amendment is for.
2) It was wrong/right of the author to write it
in the first place.
ANSWER: According to the Constitution, he has the
right to his opinion, and the right to voice it. This was my original
point.
The
point someone else made about how soldiers are the ones who make our freedoms
possible is indeed an irony, but there's nothing that makes it a requirement
that every journalist is going to appreciate that. In the words of Wesley
Snipes, "You can't take away people's right to be assholes."
Or, a
bit more gently, "We must remember the First Amendment, which protects any
shrill jackass, no matter how self-seeking." (F.G.
Withington)
So
when some reporter or religious leader or government representative starts
mouthing off and you don't like it, remember that, "He's a complete fool and
everything he says is wrong," is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT from saying, "He shouldn't
be allowed to say that and should be punished for it."
The
first is a reasonable and logical response to a loud-mouthed idiot who
lives in a free society. The second is the beginning of the destruction of
that freedom.
--J
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion