Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] In Math, Computers Don't Lie. Or Do They?
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 09:53:59 -0500
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Organization: University of Missouri
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040405
Jonathan King wrote:
>
> Well, one view of a not-disinterested biographer is here:
>
> http://physicsweb.org/article/review/16/4/2/1
>
This quotation accurately expresses my viewpoint on the subject:
The author, however, takes any hint that Einstein did not work in an
intellectual vacuum as proof positive that he was a plagiarist - as if
any scientific creation is a purely individual activity. Einstein
himself acknowledged that the special theory of relativity would soon
have been formulated without him, while claiming (correctly I believe)
that, in his absence, the general theory would not have been so easy to
arrive at. Indeed, Bjerknes has a much harder time producing evidence of
Einstein's "plagiarism" of the general theory, a topic I shall not discuss.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion