MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] In Math, Computers Don't Lie. Or Do They?
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] In Math, Computers Don't Lie. Or Do They?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Jonathan King wrote:
> 
> Well, one view of a not-disinterested biographer is here:
> 
>     http://physicsweb.org/article/review/16/4/2/1
> 


This quotation accurately expresses my viewpoint on the subject:

The author, however, takes any hint that Einstein did not work in an 
intellectual vacuum as proof positive that he was a plagiarist - as if 
any scientific creation is a purely individual activity. Einstein 
himself acknowledged that the special theory of relativity would soon 
have been formulated without him, while claiming (correctly I believe) 
that, in his absence, the general theory would not have been so easy to 
arrive at. Indeed, Bjerknes has a much harder time producing evidence of 
Einstein's "plagiarism" of the general theory, a topic I shall not discuss.
-- 

Stephen Montgomery-Smith
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion