Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Go Wal-Mart Go
- From: "Heivilin, Jim" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 08:43:42 -0500
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Thread-index: AcQbExymKPdia4WzQ1axhJVAvBhgFgAAH+kA
- Thread-topic: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Go Wal-Mart Go
> -----Original Message-----
> [mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Odle
> Subject: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Go Wal-Mart Go
>
> Seen on Slashdot:
>
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/05/national/05WALM.html?ex=1081742400&en=
0fba9b44401afe0a&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE
>
Generally speaking ./ is not one of my top, most reliable, unbiased news
reporting locations. But that's just a personal opinion.
> I know there's probably a lot of people on this list that hate the
> Great Wall of Mart, but I for one am a fan.
>
Then you haven't done or listen to anyone whose done some research on
their business practices. I don't have the data at the tip of my
fingers but what I have read has made me realize that the only "best
interest" they're concerned with is their bottom line. Perfectly
understandable (expected even) but the sugar coating they want people to
believe about them being benevolent and interested in local communities
is bunk and doesn't sit well.
Jim (not meaning to stir things up but after Monday morning traffic I'm
usually pretty surly)
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion