Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact
I can't find the info, but I believe that they wrote their own clustered filesystem/database driver. They span their web archives and crawler logs across many, many machines (10 to 12 THOUSAND) running Linux. I have a feeling that they could do it the DIY way and still be successful. Granted, building the systems would be a lot more work, but I suffer from a bad case of "Not Invented Here" syndrome; weird, considering I want an iBook and own and old iMac...
ryan woodsmall
EMAIL:PROTECTED <mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
________________________________
From: EMAIL:PROTECTED on behalf of Dave Lloyd
Sent: Thu 4/1/2004 5:12 PM
To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion
Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Google Gmail...
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Woodsmall, Ryan (IATS) wrote:
> Don't they build their own systems? I know they did in the past, but
> I'm not sure they do so anymore. Just get a few of those spiffy 3Ware
> RAID cards, some cheap 350/400GB IDE drives, stuff them into a rackmount
> case and voila, Gmail. ;)
I wonder if that wouldn't be really inefficient, though, depending on
how you store data. Is one user's data all on one machine? What
happens when that drive or machine breaks? I think that if you want
reliability and redundancy, which gmail will have to have, you'll need
to have some sort of "enterprise level" (man, I hate that buzzphrase!)
storage solution.
--
--dlloyd
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
<<winmail.dat>>
_______________________________________________ discussion mailing list EMAIL:PROTECTED http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion