Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] multiple dsl lines?
- From: "Woodsmall, Ryan \(IATS\)" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:34:03 -0600
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Thread-index: AcQIJQ3bFhn8JZtWRgK4ZP3Z3cy58AAKl1YA
- Thread-topic: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] multiple dsl lines?
Just drop them down to two lines and buy/build something like these:
http://www.biscit.net/cyclone200.html
http://www.edimax.com/html/english/products/BR-6524.htm
We did something like this with multiple ISDN lines at an ISP I worked
at years ago. Worked out nicely.
ryan woodsmall
EMAIL:PROTECTED
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EMAIL:PROTECTED
> [mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 5:27 AM
> To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion
> Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] multiple dsl lines?
>
> I'm going to get the fun of straightening out their
> networking. Should
> be a hoot setting up this LAN with each computer having it's own DSL
> connection. I'm going to suggest they cut back down to a single DSL
> connection.. just wanted to double check if anyone knew of any good
> reason for this arrangement first. Was thinking of putting
> in normal a
> 10/100 24 port switch (with gigabit between switches) and a
> wireless AP
> since to start the company is only going to have about 15
> computers. I
> really can't make any sense of this nightmare DSL
> arrangement.. and it
> sounded like Cox or whomever had told them that they didn't need a
> firewall because they'd have dynamic ip addresses. *pained*
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion