Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA Hardball
- From: "Ross, Matthew" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:40:52 -0600
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Thread-index: AcO6k0rp5GDqEHS9QamvsDMIf8qVuQAAfm6Q
- Thread-topic: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA Hardball
> Right, so what the station does is choose the "unobjectionable"
> favorite genre/sound for the FPC of the market in question, and just
> run with that. Record companies buy into this model of
> boring/predictable music to feed the radio stations. Interestingly,
> it also helps them in another way: what act actually performs the
> vapidity doesn't matter much as long as it sounds a lot like
> whatever else is out there.
One thing I've noticed is that a lot of the "popular" non-RIAA music is either religious, anti-religious, smut (foul mouthed rap falls in this category), or classical/public domain. Very little of the music I like is "safe" or "unknown", so it seems I've been successfully brainwashed as well.
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion