RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Obsolete hardware

["Spurling, Shannon" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

This is actually the continuation of the previous curve from the $800
point. I was trying to show that later in the curve it starts to
exponentially approach it's bottom value, and that is based on how long
someone would be willing to hold the old equipment in a warehouse before
it sells.

Shannon Spurling
WAN Engineer -Specialist

MOREnet, Network Services, Core Network
3212 LeMone Industrial Blvd.
Columbia, MO 65201

Main:(573) 884-7200   Fax:(573)884-6673

EMAIL:PROTECTED
EMAIL:PROTECTED


-----Original Message-----
From: EMAIL:PROTECTED
[mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED] On Behalf Of King,
Jonathan W.
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 9:19 AM
To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion
Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Obsolete hardware


On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Spurling, Shannon wrote:

> Let me revise that...

Grr; and now I've responded to the previous post. :-)  
 
> 800
> 600
> 400
> 200...
> 
> Don't worry, it will take a long time for your hardware to reach the
$10
> mark. Those 486's just reached the $10 mark in the last year or so.
The
> curve kind of tapers off. Kind of like an exponential decay.

Actually, on a percentage basis, the curve you just wrote down 
depreciates more rapidly later than earlier, unless I'm missing 
something.

jking

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion


_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion