Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

You are browsing the discussion archives
[Index of Months] [Other Lists]

• Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Mike Miller
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] from prodigy to genius?, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] from prodigy to genius?, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] from prodigy to genius?, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] from prodigy to genius?, Dave Lloyd
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] from prodigy to genius?, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] from prodigy to genius?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] from prodigy to genius?, Mike Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Dave Lloyd
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Dave Lloyd
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Dave Lloyd
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Dave Lloyd
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Russell Horn
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Matthew W. Ross
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Heivilin, Jim
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wasnt this a bad TV show when I was growingup?, Dave Lloyd
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Matthew W. Ross
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] anyone looking for a place to live?, shawn
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, Ognen Duzlevski
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, John Engelbrecht
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, Ognen Duzlevski
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, Brent Deterding
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, Ognen Duzlevski
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, Brent Deterding
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, Davis, Ryan W. (UMC-STUDENT)
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, Spurling, Shannon
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, Jason McIntosh
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall appliance, John Engelbrecht
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New cross-platform database client, Ross, Matthew
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New cross-platform database client, Michael
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New cross-platform database client, Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] University/College Administrative System, Ross, Matthew
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] University/College Administrative System, Mikhail Kovalenko
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Does the Right of First Sale Still Exist?, Jerry Gamblin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Does the Right of First Sale Still Exist?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Does the Right of First Sale Still Exist?, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Does the Right of First Sale Still Exist?, Russell Horn
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Does the Right of First Sale Still Exist?, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Does the Right of First Sale Still Exist?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Does the Right of First Sale Still Exist?, Mike Miller
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] netzero hispeed, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] netzero hispeed, Mark Rages
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] netzero hispeed, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] netzero hispeed, Michael
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] netzero hispeed, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] netzero hispeed, Mark Rages
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] netzero hispeed, Spurling, Shannon
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] netzero hispeed, Ian Scott
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] netzero hispeed, Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Jerry Gamblin
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Mark Rages
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Mike Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Jerry Gamblin
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CDR's no good for back up?, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Slashdot readers, Mark Rages
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Slashdot readers, Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] SANS NewsBites Vol. 5 Num. 35 (fwd), Mike Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] SANS NewsBites Vol. 5 Num. 35 (fwd), Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] CNN spellcheck issue?, Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] mainframe theft threatens national security, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] mainframe theft threatens national security, Mike Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] mainframe theft threatens national security, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] mainframe theft threatens national security, Jerry Gamblin
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] mainframe theft threatens national security, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] mainframe theft threatens national security, Dave Lloyd
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] mainframe theft threatens national security, Matthew W. Ross
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] mainframe theft threatens national security, Mikhail Kovalenko
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] mainframe theft threatens national security, Dave Lloyd
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Woodsmall, Ryan (IATS)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Jerry Gamblin
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Heivilin, Jim
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Woodsmall, Ryan (IATS)
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, John Engelbrecht
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Jerry Gamblin
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, John Engelbrecht
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Jerry Gamblin
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Woodsmall, Ryan (IATS)
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, Heivilin, Jim
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Jim & Dave's personal problems, John Engelbrecht
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Movies or TV or something (was an inflamitory topic), Ross, Matthew
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Movies or TV or something (was aninflamitory topic), John Engelbrecht
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Movies or TV or something (was aninflamitorytopic), Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Movies or TV or something (was aninflamitorytopic), John Engelbrecht
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Movies or TV or something (was aninflamitorytopic), Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Movies or TV or something (was aninflamitorytopic), John Engelbrecht
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, John Engelbrecht
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, Nate K
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, John Engelbrecht
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Windows annoyance: read-only files, John Engelbrecht
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Jonathan King
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Matt Ross
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Matt Ross
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Matt Ross
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Russell Horn
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Jonathan King
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spam harvesting MLUG addresses, Russell Horn
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spam harvesting MLUG addresses, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spam harvesting MLUG addresses, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spam harvesting MLUG addresses, Russell Horn
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spam harvesting MLUG addresses, Adam Procter
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Russell Horn
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Jerry Gamblin
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Dave Lloyd
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] trick for verifying e-mail receipt, John Engelbrecht
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ping and mediacom, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ping and mediacom, Matt Ross
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ping and mediacom, John Engelbrecht
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ping and mediacom, Jonathan King
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ping and mediacom, Mike Miller
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ping and mediacom, Matt Ross
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ping and mediacom, Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ping and mediacom, Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] a use for the i8088 boxes, John Engelbrecht
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] a use for the i8088 boxes, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] a use for the i8088 boxes, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] a use for the i8088 boxes, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] a use for the i8088 boxes, John Engelbrecht
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] A specific spam targeting mlug?, Ross, Matthew
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] A specific spam targeting mlug?, Mike Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] A specific spam targeting mlug?, Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] help making a dummy user, the_masked_lotus
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] help making a dummy user, Russell Horn
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] help making a dummy user, Russell Horn
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spam harvesting MLUG addresses, Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Ross, Matthew
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Jonathan King
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Jerry Gamblin
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Christian M. Cepel
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Matthew W. Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mikhail Kovalenko
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., F Vernon Green
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., George B. Robb III
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Christian M. Cepel
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Christian M. Cepel
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Matthew W. Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Matthew W. Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Matthew W. Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Matthew W. Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Matthew W. Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Russell Horn
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Russell Horn
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Matthew W. Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Matthew W. Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Matthew W. Ross
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Jerry Gamblin
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Russell Horn
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Russell Horn
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Mikhail Kovalenko
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Jerry Gamblin
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Christian M. Cepel
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RIAA picks a fight with a 12 year old, wins., Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] gnome 2.4 released today, the_masked_lotus
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Jerry Gamblin
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, John Engelbrecht
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, John Engelbrecht
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Mike Miller
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Russell Horn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Michael
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Want to talk about Job Security?, John Engelbrecht
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Matt Ross
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Matt Ross
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Heivilin, Jim
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Matt Ross
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry, John Engelbrecht
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry, Matt Ross
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry, John Engelbrecht
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry, Matt Ross
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Heivilin, Jim
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Spurling, Shannon
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ...and a good book (was Vulcan ancestry?), Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ...and a good book (was Vulcan ancestry?), Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ...and a good book (was Vulcan ancestry?), Matt Ross
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ...and a good book (was Vulcan ancestry?), Ryan Thornton
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ...and a good book (was Vulcan ancestry?), Michael
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] morphing, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ...and a good book (was Vulcan ancestry?), John Engelbrecht
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry?, John Engelbrecht
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Matt Ross
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Matt Ross
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Jonathan King
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Spurling, Shannon
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Spurling, Shannon
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Michael
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Jonathan King
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Michael
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Matt Ross
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Woodsmall, Ryan (IATS)
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Heivilin, Jim
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Woodsmall, Ryan (IATS)
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Matt Ross
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Jonathan King
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, F Vernon Green
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Jonathan King
    • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] My conspiracy theory, F Vernon Green
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] My conspiracy theory, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] My conspiracy theory, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] My conspiracy theory, Jonathan King
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] patriot act abuse, Jonathan King
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] MicrosoftLinux, the_masked_lotus
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] MicrosoftLinux, Mark Rages
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry, Heivilin, Jim
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry, John Engelbrecht
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry, Heivilin, Jim
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Vulcan ancestry, Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: discussion Digest, Vol 8, Issue 53, jeff thomann
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Transporters and other Treknology, Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: lag, John Engelbrecht
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ...and a good book (was Vulcan ancestry?), Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ...and a good book (was Vulcan ancestry?), Matt Ross
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] ...and a good book (was Vulcan ancestry?), Ross, Matthew
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] morphing, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] morphing, Mike Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] morphing, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] morphing, Ryan Thornton
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] morphing, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] morphing, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] morphing, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] morphing, Michael
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] morphing, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] morphing, Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Dave Lloyd
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Dave Lloyd
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Jason McIntosh
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Mike Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Bryan Venable
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Jason McIntosh
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Bryan Venable
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Jason McIntosh
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Dave Lloyd
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Jason McIntosh
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Dave Lloyd
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] LVM @ Dreamworks, Dave Lloyd
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] logrotate tidbit, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] logrotate tidbit, Mikhail Kovalenko
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] logrotate tidbit, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] logrotate tidbit, Mikhail Kovalenko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] logrotate tidbit, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] logrotate tidbit, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] logrotate tidbit, Jason McIntosh
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Spam ostensibly from Microsoft, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Spam ostensibly from Microsoft, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Spam ostensibly from Microsoft, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Spam ostensibly from Microsoft, Russell Horn
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Spam ostensibly from Microsoft, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Spam ostensibly from Microsoft, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Spam ostensibly from Microsoft, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Strangling VB programmers..., Matthew W. Ross
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] media player UI feedback, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WOW, LOTS of that stupid "MS Security Update" junk, Jason McIntosh
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WOW, LOTS of that stupid "MS SecurityUpdate" junk, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WOW, LOTS of that stupid "MS SecurityUpdate" junk, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WOW, LOTS of that stupid "MS SecurityUpdate" junk, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WOW, LOTS of that stupid "MS SecurityUpdate" junk, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WOW, LOTS of that stupid "MS SecurityUpdate" junk, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WOW, LOTS of that stupid "MS SecurityUpdate" junk, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WOW, LOTS of that stupid "MS SecurityUpdate" junk, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WOW, LOTS of that stupid "MS SecurityUpdate" junk, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Challenge/response to slow down spam, alspaughb-ListMail1324
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Challenge/response to slow down spam, Michael
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WOW, LOTS of that stupid "MS SecurityUpdate"junk, Davis, Ryan W. (UMC-STUDENT)
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: discussion Digest, Vol 8, Issue 69, jeff thomann
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: discussion Digest, Vol 8, Issue 69, Michael
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: discussion Digest, Vol 8, Issue 69, Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] the GNU/Linux Axe (was Re: [MLUG] RMS visits Truman StateUniversity), Jonathan King
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Sun Microsystems Chip May Unseat the Circuit Board, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Sun Microsystems Chip May Unseat theCircuit Board, Michael
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Sun Microsystems Chip May UnseattheCircuit Board, Spurling, Shannon
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Sun Microsystems Chip May UnseattheCircuit Board, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Sun Microsystems Chip May UnseattheCircuit Board, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Sun Microsystems Chip May UnseattheCircuit Board, Dave Lloyd
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Sun Microsystems Chip May UnseattheCircuit Board, Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] Name of MU [moved to discussion], Jonathan King
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Northwest Missouri State (was Re: [MLUG] Name of MU...), Jonathan King
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] RMS visits Truman State University, Mike Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] RMS visits Truman State University, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] RMS visits Truman State University, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] RMS visits Truman State University, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] RMS visits Truman State University, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] RMS visits Truman State University, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] RMS visits Truman State University, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] RMS visits Truman State University, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] RMS visits Truman State University, John Engelbrecht
• Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] We're number 73!, Kmicic
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Mayday mayday, Kmicic
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] looking for a job, Ognen Duzlevski
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Meeting Date/Time [was Re: [MLUG] MLUG = dead?], the_masked_lotus
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: Meeting Date/Time [was Re: [MLUG] MLUG =dead?], Mark Rages
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] nano-itx, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] nano-itx, Mikhail Kovalenko
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] nano-itx, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] nano-itx, Mark Rages
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] nano-itx, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] nano-itx, Matt Ross
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] nano-itx, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] alter state of mind, John Engelbrecht
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] alter state of mind, Keeler, Matthew R.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] alter state of mind, John Engelbrecht
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] alter state of mind, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] alter state of mind, Matt Ross
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] alter state of mind, Keeler, Matthew R.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] alter state of mind, Mike Miller
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!, the_masked_lotus
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Matt Ross
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Matt Ross
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Matt Ross
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!, Matt Ross
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] AMD's new 64-bit processor, Mike Miller
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Matt Ross
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Michael
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Matt Ross
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Jennifer Dozar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, John Engelbrecht
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] extra Heinlein books, Michael
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ognen Duzlevski
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ognen Duzlevski
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] fag = cigarette, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] fag = cigarette, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] fag = cigarette, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] fag = cigarette, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] fag = cigarette, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] fag = cigarette, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] wazzup?!,APC, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., Jerry Gamblin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., Davis, Ryan W. (UMC-STUDENT)
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., John Engelbrecht
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., Ognen Duzlevski
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., Jerry Gamblin
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Exploiting Cisco Routers..., Spurling, Shannon
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New MLUG website?, Jerry Gamblin
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New MLUG website?, Adam Procter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New MLUG website?, Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New MLUG website?, Adam Procter
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New MLUG website?, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Measuring units, John Engelbrecht
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Measuring units, Jerry Gamblin
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] fag = cigarette, Spurling, Shannon
  • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] SPAM and spam and Monty Python, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] SPAM and spam and Monty Python, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] SPAM and spam and Monty Python, Jonathan King
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] fag = cigarette, Ross, Matthew
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] SPAM and spam and Monty Python, Ross, Matthew
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] SPAM and spam and Monty Python, Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] SPAM and spam and Monty Python, Spurling, Shannon
    • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Jonathan King
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] SPAM and spam and Monty Python, Ross, Matthew
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Jonathan King
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Jonathan King
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Dave Lloyd
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Jonathan King
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Ross, Matthew
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Michael
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Mike Miller
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Jonathan King
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Ross, Matthew
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Origin of SPAM (Yes! I am a google GOD), Ross, Matthew
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] be humble, Michael

---

Indexed by Date