Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Jonathan King wrote:
> OK, so it looks to me like the place to focus on with regard to SARS is
> Hong Kong, where the reporting is more than a handful of cases, the
> reporting is probably fairly complete and where there is something
> resembling a modern medical system. And the news there is really,
> really grim:
> Cumulative
> #cases #deaths
> March 29 470 10
> March 31 530 13
> April 01 685 16
>
> So the death rate is just over 2%
Unfortunately, it's a little worse than that because of the 685, some are
new cases that *will* die eventually. So you don't really know your
numerator yet.
The other bad news is that it seems to be airborn so that people don't
even need to meet face-to-face to pass the virus -- it seems to spread
through hotels, airplanes and apartment buildings, probably through the
ventilation system. If that's true, it's going to be really bad.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion