Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Mike Miller wrote:
[responding to Matthew Ross]
> OK, if by "the rational thing from a biologists perspective" you mean
> "what most intelligent people would want to see." We agree on that. I'd
> like to see social systems that promote reproduction of the most
> intelligent and healthy people. I think we can do a lot better than we
> are doing now. I'm not saying we should be coercive like the Nazi's were
> (e.g., sterilizing the putatively mediocre against their wishes), but we
> can change the tax code and welfare regulations in accordance with the
> principle that 'better' people make 'better' children.
>
I'm afraid things are usually not that simple. Have any of your heard of
California's "Geek Syndrome"?
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aspergers.html
Don't know if it's an isolated case or a trend, but its implications are
intriguing. You both are also forgetting that our "civilized and
well-educated" society was built on the ignorance of the Middle Ages when few
posessed what we now consider basic knowledge. It seems that people as a
society tend to get smarter with time (do not confuse this with people as a
mob where group IQ is inversely proportional to the crowd size :).
--
MK
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion