MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] strip (was "Dillo")
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] strip (was "Dillo")
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:22:13AM -0600, Mike Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Mark Rages wrote:
> 
> > > Regarding dependencies:  I have all these even with the small file:
> >
> > This shows that the binary is compiled statically, not dynamically.
> > These are all the shared libraries that the binary is linked to.
> 
> Did you mean to say the opposite?  Because you then wrote...
> 
> > A truly static binary will not show any dependencies with ldd.
> 
> Which seems to contradict the first statement because ldd showed a lot of
> dependencies.
> 
> Mike

Yup, you're right. Caffiene deficiency.

Revised:

This shows that the binary is compiled dynamically, not statically.

Regards,
Mark
EMAIL:PROTECTED
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion