MLUG: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Money + MU = bad
RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Money + MU = bad
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I contend that they were over 21, and therefore were not youths any more. :-)

Shannon Spurling
WAN Engineer -Specialist

MOREnet, Network Services, Core Network
3212 LeMone Industrial Blvd.
Columbia, MO 65201

Main:(573) 884-7200   Fax:(573)884-6673

EMAIL:PROTECTED
EMAIL:PROTECTED



-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Procter [mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 8:31 AM
To: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Money + MU = bad


On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:39:48AM -0600, Mike Miller wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Jonathan King wrote:
> 
> > Now, the really scary thing these days is that the university just LOST
> > the big lawsuit over their charging tuition at a time when state law
> > forebade that.
> 
> 
> Having moved to Minnesota, I'm missing some of your local news.  Can
> someone please explain this?  Had the state legislature required that the
> University provide services free of charge?
> 

Some law students dredged up an 1872 law which says "youths" of the
state may attend without paying tuition and filed a class action
lawsuit.  The University contends that it charged incidental fees, not
tuition, but apparently the judge wasn't impressed with that argument.

-- 
Michael Procter
EMAIL:PROTECTED
--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/

--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/