Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
> > Hookers and Coke at least would have some use. A sculpture
> doesn't do much
> > of anything.
>
> Phillistine. :-)
Why does everybody hate the Phillistines? I'm sure they had their share of
art, or what passed for art at the time.
> > Not that I have anything against sculpture but did they really
> > need to spend that much on it? I'd much rather see an artist
> > donate the work or at least be paid something reasonable.
>
> OK, so let's work this out, shall we? Albert Paley is, as living
> sculptors go, pretty famous. Many people do and have appreciated
> his work. He's not the kind of artist who hangs around cafes all
> day desperately waiting for the commission that will make his
> reputation. His time is actually worth something, so if you want
> the guy to design and execute *2* fairly enormous sculptures, it
> will not be especially cheap. (Heck, the work can be fairly
> dangerous; the reason he won't be at the library dedication is that
> he just got out of the hospital after being treated for extensive
> 2nd and 3rd degree burns he got when his welding torch slipped.) My
> rough guess is that this work probably required about 1000 hours of
> his time (including designs, prototypes, back and forth stuff with
> the architects and the library board, etc.), and probably 1000 hours
> of various lackeys and assistants. And rent on a place big enough
> to hold stuff like this. Having said that, $240K is arguably still
> a pretty high price, although how high I wouldn't really know since
> I don't know how much the alternatives would have been.
Could be worse though. At least they didn't try to commission a statue of
some Missourian. That would even make the sculpture look good. ;-)
> > I don't blame the library for spending a donation for what it
> > was donated for but it annoys me that someone would donate that
> > much money for something so useless.
>
> I'd guess they donated the money because the possibility that great
> public art would soon be seen in Columbia excited them, and that
> they thought it would bring them and others pleasure. Not every
> piece of art is a masterpiece, of course; there is some risk. It
> may turn out that nobody will think very much of these sculptures
> now or even in the future. That would be sad, but I can't say that
> I'm annoyed that somebody tried to do *something*.
He's not annoyed that they tried, he's annoyed that they failed ;-)
> > A quarter of a million dollars could buy a lot of books, feed a
> > lot of people, etc. At my current rate of income that's about as
> > much money as I'll make in 50 years. :P
>
> So, Michael: are you handy with steel-working tools? Word on the
> street is that public sculpture is the fast ticket to a more
> comfortable life. :-)
Michael and a blowtorch, are you sure your comfortable with that mental
image??
--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php
Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/