Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Ross, Matt wrote:
> Maybe that was why it span the excess BS into an attachment then and not
> before, the size of the message may have been the deciding factor.
Maybe that's it -- that would be good for me because it would show that I
can contribute more than snide remarks about the lengths of messages (even
if it's only by accident!).
Mike
--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php
Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact