MLUG: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Oil policy (was Unfolding Universe (discovery channel))
[MLUG - DISCUSSION] Oil policy (was Unfolding Universe (discovery channel))
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Wanted to add a couple things I missed on the first pass.

Here was a large trigger for the coup, Venezuela president sacks oil executives (I'm sure there were others, but I can't believe that oil wasn't at the root of it.). You see Chavez is trying to change the flow of oil profits, by making sure that their national oil company is acting in the interests of the nation, and not US oil companies. This results in a less stable economy in the US, therefore, it is in our national interest to correct the situation. This same logic holds true for every oil supply.

Our "just in time" economy requires that raw materials be tightly scheduled for maximizing efficiency. Since all raw materials are dependent on oil for transport, it becomes critical that the supply is maintained. Even small producers like Argentina become important in this scenario, as the least bit of disruption could cause the entire structure to crumble. (the spark that starts the prairie fire)

Also, I failed to reply to one of your comments. (Sorry, was not my intent to use diversionary tactics)


This is just nonsense.  Of the 3 countries you have just mentioned, only
Venezuela has petroleum reserves that are (at present) even a little bit
interesting in terms of "controlling" world oil markets.  There is no
doubt that oil and energy companies exert undue influence at home and
abroad, but to claim that US oil interests have had anything like control
over the situation is just silly.  I mean, unless you'd like to argue that
they went out of their way to lose their shirts in the 80s when OPEC set
production targets at a level where prices collapsed (to name one
stupendous debacle).

First, OPEC represent the nations that possess the oil, not the companies who are trying to obtain "cheap natural resources", or the US government. So the 'they' above is two different groups. 

I would say that the price collapse was a result of the friction that results between maintaining a "gentlemen's agreement", and the individual pursuit of greed. (or in other words, everyone cheats for their immediate benefit, even though they could all profit more collectively if they didn't.) This is merely a break-down of trust (that doesn't really exist anyway). This has always been a problem in cartels, and has been with OPEC since day 1.



-- To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/