Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Ross, Matt wrote:
> > We're overpopulated in some places on Earth and underpopulated in
> > other places. We can certainly 'support' billions more diseased,
> > starving people. If we could agree on how to manage things, we could
> > probably support many more people at a higher level of subsistence,
> > but we can't get along that well yet.
>
> Eventually, no matter how you look at it, there is a breaking point. I
> don't know if its when we run out of elbow room, or when we run out of
> carbon atoms though.
Here's a fun fact for you: Everyone on Earth could easily fit into one
big cubic-mile-size box. Let's give everyone a 6' x 2' x 2' space. That
would allow for 6,133,248,000 people...
5280^3/(6*2*2*10^9) = 6.1332
Sure, a few people won't fit in their space, but most people (e.g., kids)
would have loads of extra room. And that's without puréeing anybody!
So I don't feel that we're near carrying capacity yet.
Mike
--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php
Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/