Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Ross, Matt wrote:
> Do you know if the rig noticed?
I'm sure the sound of skidding followed by the sound of glass
breaking and the remains of a Toyot swinging into the rear view
mirror provided strong evidence that something had happened. :-)
> Actually, the more modern cars would be more bent than a 70's
> car, due to "Crumple" technology, designed to let the car fall
> appart rather than the driver take the impact.
Good point, but the passenger compartment would have suffered less.
> > And you are correct about the Corolla being able to last forever; I
> > swear that they backed off a bit in the quality in the 80s because
> > longevity of some of their earlier models was affecting their sales.
> > A colleague in the department has an '85 Corolla with an unknown
> > (over 200K I think) number of miles on it.
>
> The new ones claim to last as long, is that not true?
I'm sure they last just fine, but some of the mid-70s/early 80s
models are *still* out there, especially in California, where rust
(the big weakness of your average 70s Toy car) is not a factor.
Now, of course, there are lots of collectible cars out there that
are this old and much older, and some do still get significant
mileage on them (the California Z Car cult in particular). But
nobody set out to collect a 1978 Corolla, or a 1976 "Hondamatic"
Accord (there is now a California collector's cult on these babies,
too).
jking
--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php
Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/