MLUG: Re: Analog vs. digital (was Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] okay, mp3 fans...)
Re: Analog vs. digital (was Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] okay, mp3 fans...)
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
> It's called 'noise.'
Certain kinds of noise do enhance the sound.  You see, nobody really knows 
how the human brain interprets sound.  Noise is likely a large part of it.  
Therefore, many kinds of noise do help the sound.  However, you can't just 
simply ignore the significant errors that CDs produce.  In fact, CD decoders 
INSERT noise into sound and interpolate it to do something (don't remember 
exactly what).  Besides, when the laser can't read something off the disc, 
the decoder interpolates and produces crap.  Therefore, CDs are a very flawed 
format.

> If you are worried about archiving, go digital.  Store CDs in multiple
> locations and upgrade the media every decade or so.  They will never
> change, not at all.  I think digital storage is much safer in this way
> than any kind of analog storage.
Hey, the media will become obsolete after a while, and so will the formats.  
If you constantly convert them to new formats, they will start looking screwy.
-- 
-- Igor
--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/