MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Fwd: [free-sklyarov] FW: USENIX -- Proposed LegislationSignificantly Affecting Computer Profession
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Fwd: [free-sklyarov] FW: USENIX -- Proposed LegislationSignificantly Affecting Computer Profession
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
> I dunno.  I don't think anyone can speak for "MLUG" and I wonder if 
> individual letters aren't more persuasive than group statements.  I've 
> thought about writing Carnahan who turns out to be on some interesting 
> committees such as Armed Services, Government Operations and Commerce 
> http://carnahan.senate.gov/committees.htm but things seemed to be moving 
> so fast and the language is so technical and disjointed that I've never 
> known quite what to say.  It does look like PATRIOT (these guys don't 
> mind being obvious, do they?) isn't as bad as Ashcroft's original 
> proposal   

The staffers probably spend hours figuring out those acroymns. Our tax
dollars at work.

--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/