MLUG: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Microsoft: Evil Empire or Suitable Softw are?
RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Microsoft: Evil Empire or Suitable Softw are?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
haven't MS and Netscape both diverged a bit from the W3C standard? I
remember trying to do some cross-browser DHTML about a year ago and never
getting it to look the same in both browsers. Even the sites that I found
touting "DHTML howto" didn't come out right in both browsers...

Rick 
Ok I'll admit it, I set you up the bomb


-----Original Message-----
From: EMAIL:PROTECTED
[mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Spurling,
Shannon 
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 10:02 PM
To: EMAIL:PROTECTED '
Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Microsoft: Evil Empire or Suitable
Softw are?


>From what I understand, HTML was supposed to be like Tex. 
It's not supposed to be browser dependant. It's all the extensions that they
added to it that makes it change format dependant on browser, if I remember
correctly. 

Shannon
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Napier
To: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Sent: 8/1/01 9:56 PM
Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Microsoft:  Evil Empire or Suitable Softw
are?

When the W3C set the standards for HTML I wonder if they figured on
having to set a standard for 5 different browsers. I have often just
said F*ck it I will do it with JAVA, at least most browsers display an
applet the way the programmer/Developer intended. I mean how many ways
can you display TEXT other than the way it is written?

-----Original Message-----
From: EMAIL:PROTECTED
[mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phoebe Kempe
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 5:43 PM
To: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Subject: RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Microsoft: Evil Empire or Suitable
Softw are?


--- "Ross, Matt" <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> Microsoft assumptions are correct for 50% of the
> population.  The lower half
> of the intelegence scale, granted, but still, that's
> not bad for an
> assumption with no real data.
> 

Yeah. However, it is truly unacceptable for someone to
design for one browser or another. It's the hallmark
of an amateur or at least a bad designer. I cannot
stand going to sites that say "best viewed with x
browser". True, designers have numerous obstacles to
overcome. However, it isn't all that difficult to test
one's work on multiple O/Ss with multiple browsers.

Just my $.02.

--Phoebe

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
--
To manage your subscription, go to
http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/

--
To manage your subscription, go to
http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/
--
To manage your subscription, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/
--
To manage your subscription, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/