Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Tuesday 01 May 2001 01:50, you wrote:
> > Well.. satellite is offered everywhere. StarBand's web site
> > (www.starband.com) says "if you can see the southern sky, you can get
> > StarBand." It is rather pricey though, and there are latency issues due
> > to the distance involved. It's fine for web browsing and whatnot, but
> > things like quake are out of the question. I'd also imagine an
> > interactive console session being rather sluggish.
>
> While I have not tested the home versions I did do some consulting work
> for an ISP in Australia for a while and they hooked to the Internet
> through satellite as at that time there were no really decent land lines
> available. (Not sure if they have them now..) The connection was
> reasonably fast and while there was some slight sluggishness it was never
> really bad enough to become frustrating for normal console sessions. I'd
> agree that it might not work well for Net games though. Of course they
> paid something like US$50,000/month for that connection.. not sure how the
> home units stack up. If you find out lemme know though. I am wanting to
> move to the boonies some where but haven't been able to bring myself to
> cut all Net access.
In ukraine (Sevastopol) where i'm from, the internet access is mostly
provided by satellite, it is slow and expensive. About 2c a minute. VERY
expensive for people that live there. The connection sucks, too. However,
the only other alternative is for all isps in that city to run over a phone
line/56K link to Kiev. Talk about slow - it's like the freaking dark ages
there.
--
-- Igor
--
To manage your subscription, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php
Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/