Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

You are browsing the discussion archives
[Index of Months] [Other Lists]

• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Top Talkers., Neil Bradshaw
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Following message threads, Stephen Bohm
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Following message threads, Scott Hussey
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Following message threads, Stephen Bohm
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Following message threads, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Following message threads, Stephen Bohm
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Following message threads, Stephen Bohm
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Following message threads, Mike Miller
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Following message threads, Mark Taylor
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Following message threads, Jonathan King
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, George B. Robb III
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, James Brockman
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Nathan Odle
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Rick Buford
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Spurling, Shannon
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Rick Buford
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Nathan Odle
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Aaron Littich
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, McNutt, Justin M.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Spurling, Shannon
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cheap monitors?, Nathan Odle
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] AT&T, Jim Oxenhandler
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] AT&T, Jonathan King
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] AT&T, Isomer1
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] AT&T, Rob Judd
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] AT&T, Jim Oxenhandler
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] AT&T, McNutt, Justin M.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Being way off topic, Rick Buford
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] detection of CD-RW, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] detection of CD-RW, Igor Izyumin Jr.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Ryan Woodsmall
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Neil Bradshaw
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, phill
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Dave Lloyd
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Dave Lloyd
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Ian Monroe
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, phill
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, phill
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Andrew Procter
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jonathan King
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls?, Jennifer Dozar
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Lloyd, Jamie
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Lloyd, Jamie
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, phill
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Lloyd, Jamie
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Nowlin, Dan
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Nowlin, Dan
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Lloyd, Jamie
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Stephen Bohm
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Andrew Procter
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Nowlin, Dan
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Lloyd, Jamie
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Neil Bradshaw
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Aaron Littich
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Aaron Littich
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, phill
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Aaron Littich
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, phill
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Mike Miller
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] imap and pop, Rob Judd
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] imap and pop, Mikhail Kovalenko
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Neil Bradshaw
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Neil Bradshaw
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Stephen Bohm
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Stephen Bohm
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Stephen Bohm
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Nowlin, Dan
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Curtis Jewell
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Lloyd, Jamie
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Lloyd, Jamie
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Nowlin, Dan
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Lloyd, Jamie
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Nowlin, Dan
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Curtis Jewell
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Curtis Jewell
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Lloyd, Jamie
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Nowlin, Dan
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Lloyd, Jamie
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, McNutt, Justin M.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, McNutt, Justin M.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Nowlin, Dan
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Aaron Littich
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Lloyd, Jamie
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls, Rick Buford
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls - goddamn!, Nathan Odle
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls - goddamn!, Neil Bradshaw
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., McNutt, Justin M.
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Neil Bradshaw
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., James Brockman
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Jennifer Dozar
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Jennifer Dozar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Ryan Thornton
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Neil Bradshaw
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Mike Miller
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., McNutt, Justin M.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., McNutt, Justin M.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Michael
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., (8?>
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., McNutt, Justin M.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Pants., McNutt, Justin M.
    • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] triple point, Jonathan King
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] STP (was: Pants), Igor Izyumin Jr.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, McNutt, Justin M.
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Jennifer Dozar
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Curtis Jewell
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Stephen Bohm
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Aaron Littich
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, Jeremiah Johnson
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Michael
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, McNutt, Justin M.
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] girls- chill out!!!!!, Jennifer Dozar
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Stephen Bohm
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Aaron Littich
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Steve Bell
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Jennifer Dozar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Deterding, Brent D.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, McNutt, Justin M.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Michael
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Deterding, Brent D.
  • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Deterding, Brent D.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] napster alternatives, Deterding, Brent D.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, Davis, Ryan Wiley (UMC-Student)
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, Neil Bradshaw
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, phill
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, Jennifer Dozar
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, Mike Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, David Abadir
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, rwd7ec
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, Ian Monroe
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, Jennifer Dozar
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] WTF?!?! And the LoneGunman Series!, Jennifer Dozar
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, McNutt, Justin M.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] off da wall subjects, McNutt, Justin M.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Voltage Regulator for PII, George B. Robb III
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG-DSCUSSION] napster alternatives, Deterding, Brent D.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG-DSCUSSION] napster alternatives, Spurling, Shannon
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] *** n8 has left #mlug-discussion, Nathan Odle
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] *** n8 has left #mlug-discussion, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] *** n8 has left #mlug-discussion, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] *** n8 has left #mlug-discussion, Jennifer Dozar
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] *** n8 has left #mlug-discussion, Ryan Woodsmall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] *** n8 has left #mlug-discussion, McNutt, Justin M.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, McNutt, Justin M.
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Neil Bradshaw
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Jonathan King
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV - Wireless knowledge, fuzzz
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Jonathan King
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, McNutt, Justin M.
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cable TV, McNutt, Justin M.
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] triple point, McNutt, Justin M.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] triple point, Neil Bradshaw
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] triple point, McNutt, Justin M.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking about...., Spurling, Shannon
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking about...., Ryan Thornton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking about...., Deorukhkar, Mayuresh S. (UMC-Student)
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking about...., Deterding, Brent D.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking about...., Deterding, Brent D.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking about...., Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Neil Bradshaw
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Mark Taylor
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Jonathan King
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Mike Miller
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Scott Hussey
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Steve Cooper
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurats, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurats, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurats, Michael
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Guide to Living in Columbia, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Guide to Living in Columbia, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Jeremy Hinegardner
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Jonathan King
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Neil Bradshaw
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Neil Bradshaw
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Jonathan King
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Iron Chefs (was: Sushi), Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Iron Chefs (was: Sushi), Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Iron Chefs (was: Sushi), Ian Monroe
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Ryan Woodsmall
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Jonathan King
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Jennifer Dozar
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (really about sushi this time), Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (really about sushi this time), Jennifer Dozar
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Jennifer Dozar
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Jamie Lloyd
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Neil Bradshaw
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Dave Lloyd
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Ryan Woodsmall
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Jonathan King
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi, Michael
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Finn, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sushi (also really about sushi), Jonathan King
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Deorukhkar, Mayuresh S. (UMC-Student)
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Jonathan King
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Jennifer Dozar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Deterding, Brent D.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Deterding, Brent D.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Jonathan King
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Michael
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, rwd7ec
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Deorukhkar, Mayuresh S. (UMC-Student)
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Restaurants, Jennifer Dozar
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Rick Buford
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Dave Lloyd
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Rick Buford
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Dave Lloyd
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capita l??, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capita l??, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capita l??, James Brockman
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Jennifer Dozar
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Jonathan King
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Jonathan King
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capita l??, Bryan Venable
  • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Jonathan King
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capital??, Mike Miller
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking ab out...., Deterding, Brent D.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking ab out...., Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking ab out...., Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking about...., Michael
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capita l??, Deterding, Brent D.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capita l??, Michael
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking ab out...., Deterding, Brent D.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking ab out...., Michael
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking ab out...., Deterding, Brent D.
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking ab out...., Ryan Thornton
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Okay, now I know what you were talking ab out...., Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] math people, Deterding, Brent D.
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capita l??, Deterding, Brent D.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] columbia as a high-tech capita l??, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] job opportunities in the future, Deterding, Brent D.
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] job opportunities in the future, Dave Lloyd
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] job opportunities in the future, Deterding, Brent D.
    • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] 18gig drive?, Jason Youngquist
• Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Snort, Ryan Thornton
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cross Platform, Jim Oxenhandler
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cross Platform, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cross Platform, Mikhail Kovalenko
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cross Platform, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Jonathan King
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Rick Buford
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Jonathan King
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Dave Lloyd
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, George B. Robb III
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Satilite Internet (was: dot com crunch?), Michael
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Jonathan King
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Jonathan King
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Rick Buford
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] dot com crunch?, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Neil Bradshaw
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Michael
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for michael., Nathan Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for michael., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for michael., Ryan Woodsmall
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for michael., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for michael., Jennifer Dozar
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Igor Izyumin Jr.
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Mark Taylor
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Neil Bradshaw
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), McNutt, Justin M.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Rick Buford
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Neil Bradshaw
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] spammy aren't we? :), Rick Buford
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] software demos?, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] FW: Large Criminal Hacker Attack on Windows NT E-Banking and E-Co mmerce Sites, Deterding, Brent D.
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] FW: Large Criminal Hacker Attackon Windows NT E-Banki ng and E-Co mmerce Sites, Neil Bradshaw
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] don't resend old posts, Mike Miller
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Some things never change. :-), McNutt, Justin M.
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Some things never change. :-), Igor Izyumin Jr.
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Some things never change. :-), Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Some things never change. :-), Curtis Jewell
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Some things never change. :-), Igor Izyumin Jr.
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] rant was girls, Nowlin, Dan
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] rant was girls, Mike Miller
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] rant was girls, Neil Bradshaw
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] rant was girls, Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] rant was girls, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] rant was girls, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] rant was girls, Nowlin, Dan
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] rant was girls, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] rant was girls, Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] rant was girls, Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] rant was girls, Deterding, Brent D.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] rant was girls, Michael
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Some things never change. :-), McNutt, Justin M.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Some things never change. :-), McNutt, Justin M.
    • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] tag lines (was: Some things never change), Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] neanderthals among us (was: Large Criminal Hacker), Mikhail Kovalenko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] neanderthals among us (was: Large Criminal Hacker), McNutt, Justin M.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] Meetings?, Davis, Ryan Wiley (UMC-Student)
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] Meetings?, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] Meetings?, Jonathan King
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] Meetings?, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] Meetings?, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] Meetings?, Michael
  • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] Meetings?, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Chris W
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Chris W
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Chris W
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Jamie Lloyd
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Chris W
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Jennifer Dozar
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Ian Monroe
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] windows and alt-tab, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Good security books?, Michael
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Good security books?, McNutt, Justin M.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Good security books?, Rick Buford
  • FW: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Good security books?, Deterding, Brent D.
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for michael., McNutt, Justin M.
  • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Zork (was: for michael), Michael
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for michael., McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for michael., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for michael., Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for michael., Michael
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for michael., Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for michael., McNutt, Justin M.
    • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Python (was: for michael), Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Python (was: for michael), Jonathan King
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Python (was: for michael), Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, McNutt, Justin M.
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Jamie Lloyd
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Jennifer Dozar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, McNutt, Justin M.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Lloyd, Jamie
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Spurling, Shannon
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Jennifer Dozar
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Lloyd, Jamie
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Jennifer Dozar
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Neil Bradshaw
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Lloyd, Jamie
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Ryan Woodsmall
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Lloyd, Jamie
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Neil Bradshaw
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, John Engelbrecht
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Jennifer Dozar
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Andrew Procter
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Neil Bradshaw
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Jennifer Dozar
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Lloyd, Jamie
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Jennifer Dozar
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, John Engelbrecht
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, McNutt, Justin M.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] cartoons, Jennifer Dozar
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paper cell phones, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paper cell phones, Ryan Thornton
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paper cell phones, Jennifer Dozar
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paper cell phones, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paper cell phones, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paper cell phones, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paper cell phones, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paper cell phones, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paper cell phones, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paper cell phones, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paper cell phones, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Look at this, Jim Oxenhandler
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Look at this, Ryan Woodsmall
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Look at this, Jim Oxenhandler
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] TEST- PLEASE DELETE, Neil Bradshaw
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Another Test, Neil Bradshaw
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Last Test, Neil Bradshaw
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] clumping algorithms, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Egg Catapault Contest, 4pm on Francis Quadrangle, Nathan Odle
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Egg Catapault Contest, 4pm on FrancisQuadrangle, Mike Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Egg Catapault Contest, 4pm on Francis Quadrangle, Nathan Odle
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Egg Catapault Contest, 4pm on FrancisQuadrangle, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Egg Catapault Contest, 4pm on FrancisQuadrangle, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Egg Catapault Contest, 4pm on FrancisQuadrangle, Mike Miller
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Re: [MLUG] email style (was: Meetings?), Jonathan King
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), Neil Bradshaw
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), phill
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), James Brockman
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), Jennifer Dozar
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), Jennifer Dozar
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), Michael
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Important Question (Off-Topic), Davis, Ryan Wiley (UMC-Student)
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RE: [MLUG] lynx to Speech, John Engelbrecht
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Frames (was: Meetings?), Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Different pages, Jim Oxenhandler
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Different pages, James Brockman
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Different pages, Neil Bradshaw
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Different pages, Igor Izyumin Jr.
• Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] BIOS access programs?, Daniel Nowlin
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] BIOS access programs?, Igor Izyumin Jr.
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] BIOS access programs?, Nathan Odle
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] BIOS access programs?, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] BIOS access programs?, Nathan Odle
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] BIOS access programs?, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Aaron Littich
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Jim Oxenhandler
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Mike Miller
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Jim Oxenhandler
    • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] backup web server and mail server, Jason Youngquist
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] backup web server and mail server, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Ian Monroe
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, James Brockman
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Hargus, Duane
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Finn, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Neil Bradshaw
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] deleting files in Windows, Finn, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall-1, Deterding, Brent D.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall-1, fuzzz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] firewall-1, Deterding, Brent D.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Aaron Littich
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, James Brockman
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Michael
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Microsoft Windows, James Brockman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Hargus, Duane
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Jonathan King
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Andrew Procter
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Neil Bradshaw
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Andrew Procter
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Goddamn Microsoft Windows, Mike Miller
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG] Beowolf cluster], Rick Buford
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG]Beowolf cluster], Neil Bradshaw
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG]Beowolf cluster], Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG]Beowolf cluster], Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG]Beowolf cluster], Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG]Beowolf cluster], Neil Bradshaw
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG]Beowolf cluster], Neil Bradshaw
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG]Beowolf cluster], Michael
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG] Beowolf cluster], Rick Buford
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG] Beowolf cluster], Neil Bradshaw
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG] Beowolf cluster], Neil Bradshaw
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG] Beowolf cluster], Jay Buffington
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] You want a Linux related Job?, Lloyd, Jamie
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Uhhh - topics? I have technical questions!, Deterding, Brent D.
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Uhhh - topics? I have technical questions!, Michael
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Uhhh - topics? I have technical questions!, Spurling, Shannon
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] creating a hostile list - was [RE: [MLUG] Beowolf cluster], Deterding, Brent D.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] perl/cgi, Jim Oxenhandler
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] perl/cgi, Mikhail Kovalenko
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] perl/cgi, Jim Oxenhandler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] perl/cgi, McFarland, Jason M.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for those who missed out, Michael
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for those who missed out, Davis, Ryan Wiley (UMC-Student)
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for those who missed out, Ryan Woodsmall
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for those who missed out, Neil Bradshaw
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for those who missed out, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for those who missed out, Igor Izyumin Jr.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for those who missed out, Chris W
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for those who missed out, Deterding, Brent D.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for those who missed out, Neil Bradshaw
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for those who missed out, Spurling, Shannon
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for those who missed out, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] for those who missed out, Rick Buford
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Microsoft Windows, Deterding, Brent D.
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Microsoft Windows, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Lloyd, Jamie
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Igor Izyumin Jr.
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., James Brockman
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Ted Peterson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Nowlin, Dan
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Lloyd, Jamie
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Igor Izyumin Jr.
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., James Brockman
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., James Brockman
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Lloyd, Jamie
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Nowlin, Dan
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Neil Bradshaw
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Lloyd, Jamie
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Rick Buford
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., phill
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Deterding, Brent D (UMC-Student)
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Neil Bradshaw
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Deterding, Brent D (UMC-Student)
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Dave Lloyd
    • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Jobs (was: Newbie Classes..), Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Jobs (was: Newbie Classes..), Neil Bradshaw
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Newbie Classes.., Deterding, Brent D (UMC-Student)
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Lloyd, Jamie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Lloyd, Jamie
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Ian Scott
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Lloyd, Jamie
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Ryan Thornton
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, Lloyd, Jamie
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED, phill
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] making figures for a talk, and march madness..., Jonathan King
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] making figures for a talk, and march madness..., Jonathan King
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] making figures for a talk, and march madness..., Jennifer Dozar
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] making figures for a talk, and march madness..., Curtis Jewell
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DynDNS, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DynDNS, Neil Bradshaw
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DynDNS, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DynDNS, Ian Scott
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DynDNS, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DynDNS, Ian Scott
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DynDNS, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DynDNS, John Engelbrecht
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DynDNS, Nowlin, Dan
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DynDNS, Ian Scott
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DynDNS, Michael
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DynDNS, Rick Buford
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Uhhh - topics? I have technical questions !, Deterding, Brent D (UMC-Student)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Uhhh - topics? I have technical questions !, Deterding, Brent D (UMC-Student)
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Uhhh - topics? I have technical questions !, Spurling, Shannon
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Jobs (was: Newbie Classes..), Deterding, Brent D (UMC-Student)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Jobs (was: Newbie Classes..), Rick Buford
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Jobs (was: Newbie Classes..), Michael
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Jobs (was: Newbie Classes..), Mike Miller
      • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] I'm not a total bum (was: Jobs), Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] I'm not a total bum (was: Jobs), Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] I'm not a total bum (was: Jobs), Michael
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] I'm not a total bum (was: Jobs), Rick Buford
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] I'm not a total bum (was: Jobs), Mikhail Kovalenko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] I'm not a total bum (was: Jobs), Rick Buford
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED users, Lloyd, Jamie
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED users, Ian Scott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] EMAIL:PROTECTED users, Lloyd, Jamie
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] OFFTOPIC: Good TI-86 Pages, Neil Bradshaw
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] OFFTOPIC: Good TI-86 Pages, Ian Scott
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] OFFTOPIC: Good TI-86 Pages, Enickohasan
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] OFFTOPIC: Good TI-86 Pages, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] OFFTOPIC: Good TI-86 Pages, Nathan Odle
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] OFFTOPIC: Good TI-86 Pages, Igor Izyumin Jr.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] eprom burner, Igor Izyumin Jr.
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] eprom burner, Aaron Littich
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] eprom burner, Igor Izyumin Jr.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Nathan's Egg, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] links as .. ?, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] links as .. ?, Mikhail Kovalenko
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] links as .. ?, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] links as .. ?, Michael
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] links as .. ?, Michael
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] default for background images.., Lloyd, Jamie
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paraport wireless?, Michael
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paraport wireless?, Igor Izyumin Jr.
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paraport wireless?, Aaron Littich
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paraport wireless?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paraport wireless?, Aaron Littich
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paraport wireless?, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] paraport wireless?, Igor Izyumin Jr.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] OFFTOPIC: Neff Auditorium, Neil Bradshaw
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] OFFTOPIC: Neff Auditorium, Jennifer Dozar
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] OFFTOPIC: Neff Auditorium, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] OFFTOPIC: Neff Auditorium, Steve Cooper
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Scott Hussey
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Mike Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Rick Buford
    • [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Sendmail problems., Jason Youngquist
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, Mikhail Kovalenko
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] simple perl question, McNutt, Justin M.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Remove me from this discussion!!!!!!!, maximus
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Remove me from this discussion!!!!!!!, Mike Miller
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Oh for the love of all that is holy - ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US, Deterding, Brent D (UMC-Student)
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Oh for the love of all that is holy - ALLYOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Oh for the love of all that is holy - ALLYOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US, Neil Bradshaw
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Oh for the love of all that is holy - ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Oh for the love of all that is holy - ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US, Chris W
      • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Oh for the love of all that is holy - ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US, Mike Miller
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Oh for the love of all that is holy - ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US, Spurling, Shannon
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Oh for the love of all that is holy - ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US, McNutt, Justin M.
• Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Oh for the love of all that is holy - ALLYOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US, Mike Miller
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cryptologists Discover Flaw in E-Mail Security Program, Mike Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cryptologists Discover Flaw in E-Mail Security Program, McNutt, Justin M.
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cryptologists Discover Flaw in E-Mail Security Program, Mike Miller
• RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cryptologists Discover Flaw in E-Mail Sec urity Program, Deterding, Brent D (UMC-Student)
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cryptologists Discover Flaw in E-Mail Security Program, Jonathan King
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Cryptologists Discover Flaw in E-Mail Sec urity Program, McNutt, Justin M.
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] All Your Base thingie, Rick Buford
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] All Your Base thingie, Ryan Thornton
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] generating 'date' for tomorrow, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] generating 'date' for tomorrow, Ian Scott
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] generating 'date' for tomorrow, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] generating 'date' for tomorrow, Ian Scott
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] generating 'date' for tomorrow, Curtis Jewell
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] generating 'date' for tomorrow, Ian Scott
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] generating 'date' for tomorrow, Jonathan King
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] generating 'date' for tomorrow, Adam Procter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] generating 'date' for tomorrow, Anderson, Bill
    • RE: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] generating 'date' for tomorrow, Mike Miller
• [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Mike Miller
  • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Neil Bradshaw
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Mike Miller
    • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Aaron Littich
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, John Engelbrecht
      • Ethical Question (was Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced), Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: Ethical Question (was Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced), Mikhail Kovalenko
      • Re: Ethical Question (was Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans bereplaced), John Engelbrecht
      • Re: Ethical Question (was Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans bereplaced), Michael
      • Re: Ethical Question (was Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans bereplaced), John Engelbrecht
      • Re: Ethical Question (was Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans bereplaced), Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Aaron Littich
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Aaron Littich
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Michael
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Mike Miller
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, John Engelbrecht
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Aaron Littich
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] will humans be replaced, Neil Bradshaw
      • Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSI